Deep Tech · Paradigm Analysis
Technology Analysis Blog
Paradigm
Shift Lab
Breaking barriers through materials & structural innovation
Skip to main content

China's Space Program Is Bigger Than You Think

Space & Launch Series · 12 · Part 1 of 2

China’s Space Program Is
Bigger Than You Think

93 launches in a single year. Nearly 28,000 satellites planned. A reusable booster that came down within meters of the pad. While the headlines chased Starship, China quietly built the second-largest space industry on Earth — and it’s accelerating.

China Space Program Guowang · Qianfan Zhuque-3 Megaconstellation ~9 min read
A Number Most People Get Wrong
Ask who’s winning the space race and people say SpaceX. They’re right.
But here’s the part they miss:
the country in second place just had the biggest year in its history — and it isn’t slowing down.

There’s a number from 2025 that I think most people would guess wrong by roughly half. It’s the number of times China launched a rocket into orbit: ninety-three. Not a typo, not a cumulative total, not “announced.” Ninety-three rockets, in twelve months, actually flown.

I went into this expecting to write the familiar story — China is catching up, but it’s still years behind. By the time I’d finished pulling the 2025 numbers, I’d quietly deleted that framing. “Catching up” undersells it. China didn’t just have a good year in space; it had a record-shattering one, and then announced 2026 would be busier. This is Part 1 of two: here we look at the machine — the launches, the satellites, the rockets, the companies. Part 2 looks at what China plans to do with it.

93
orbital launches in 2025
a new national record —
up from 68 in 2024
~28K
satellites planned
Guowang + Qianfan
megaconstellations
88%
of all global launches
came from just two countries:
the U.S. and China

The Headline Number: 93 Launches in One Year

Let’s start with the stat that should make you sit up. In 2025, China conducted a national-record number of orbital launches — CASC, the main state contractor, reported 93 missions for the country, while independent trackers logged it at around 92. Either way, it shattered the previous record of 68 set in 2024, and China’s annual launch count has now increased every single year since 2019.

For context: the state-owned giant CASC alone flew 73 of those missions and lofted more than 300 spacecraft into orbit. That’s not a research program with occasional launches. That’s an industrial cadence.

Orbital Launches in 2025 — The Two-Horse Race
China 2023 China 2024 China 2025 USA 2025 67 68 93 193 incl. 165 Falcon 9
Source: CASC year-end release; SpaceNews 2025 launch analysis (Jan 2026). U.S. total includes Rocket Lab Electron flights.

The interesting part isn’t that the U.S. still launches more — it does, and by a healthy margin, almost entirely thanks to SpaceX’s 165 Falcon 9 flights. The interesting part is that the United States and China together accounted for roughly 88% of all orbital launches on the planet in 2025. Everyone else — Europe, Russia, India, Japan, the whole rest of the world — is fighting over the remaining sliver. Space, in 2025, became a two-country story. And one of those countries is the one we tend to wave off.

The Part Almost Everyone Misses: The Megaconstellations

Here’s where it stops being a launch-count trivia question and starts being strategy. A large chunk of those 2025 launches weren’t science missions or one-off satellites. They were bricks in two enormous walls China is building in low Earth orbit — its answer to Starlink.

There are two flagship programs, and the numbers in their regulatory filings are genuinely hard to process. Guowang (“national network,” run by state-owned China SatNet) has filed for 12,992 satellites. Qianfan (“Thousand Sails,” backed by the Shanghai government, formerly nicknamed “G60 Starlink”) is targeting 15,000. That’s nearly 28,000 satellites between just those two — and a third commercial constellation, LandSpace’s Honghu-3, adds another 10,000 to the wishlist.

China’s Megaconstellations — Planned vs. Actually in Orbit
PLANNED (per ITU filings) Guowang 12,992 Qianfan (Thousand Sails) 15,000 Honghu-3 (LandSpace) 10,000 Gold sliver = roughly what was actually in orbit by Dec 2025: ~136 (Guowang), ~108 (Qianfan) The gap between the bar and the gold sliver is the entire story. The plan is colossal; deployment has only just begun.
Source: ITU filings; SpaceNews (Jan 2026) deployment counts. Figures are targets, not commitments.

Now, here’s the honest counterweight — and it matters. As of December 2025, Guowang had only around 136 operational satellites in orbit, and Qianfan roughly 108. Against targets in the tens of thousands, that’s a rounding error. So no, China hasn’t built a Starlink rival yet. Not even close.

But what struck me digging into this is the regulatory clock. To keep their international spectrum rights, these constellations face ITU deadlines — Guowang reportedly needs about 10% of its fleet up by 2029 and half by 2032. That’s not a vague aspiration; it’s a use-it-or-lose-it countdown. Which means the launch cadence we just looked at isn’t peaking. It pretty much has to keep climbing. The 93 launches of 2025 may end up looking quaint.

📌 Why This Is About More Than Internet

Analysts widely treat Guowang and Qianfan as dual-use national infrastructure, not pure consumer broadband plays. Starlink’s role in Ukraine was a wake-up call: a resilient, sovereign satellite-internet layer has obvious strategic value. That’s a big reason these projects get guaranteed funding and priority launch slots — they’re treated as critical infrastructure, not a side business.

The Missing Piece: Reusable Rockets (and a Spectacular Fireball)

Now for the honest weakness — and it’s the very thing that makes those 28,000-satellite plans look almost reckless. Until recently, China could not do the one trick that makes mass deployment affordable: reuse a rocket. SpaceX’s entire cost advantage comes from landing and reflying boosters, sometimes 20-plus times each. For all its cadence, China was still throwing its rockets away after every flight.

That started to change on December 3, 2025, and the way it changed is almost cinematic. The private company LandSpace launched Zhuque-3 — a stainless-steel, methane-fueled, nine-engine rocket that looks suspiciously like a Falcon 9 — on its maiden flight. It reached orbit successfully. Then it tried to land the booster… and the first stage came down within meters of its target pad before erupting into a dramatic fireball.

Here’s the thing, though: landing “within meters” on your very first try is, by aerospace standards, breathtakingly close. LandSpace called the flight a success because the recovery system, engine throttling, and attitude control all worked — it was the final touchdown burn that failed. The company has since announced a second recovery attempt for Q2 2026 and aims to actually re-fly a recovered booster by the end of 2026.

And Zhuque-3 isn’t alone — it’s the opening act. A whole wave of Chinese reusable rockets is queuing up: the state-built Long March 12A, Space Pioneer’s Tianlong-3 (an even more direct Falcon 9 near-clone), and others. Honestly, my bet is that 2026 is the year China stops being the country that can’t land a rocket. The interesting question is no longer whether they’ll crack reusability, but how fast they ride down the cost curve once they do.

The Companies Actually Doing It

One reason China’s scale gets underestimated abroad is that the names aren’t household ones. There’s no single “Chinese SpaceX.” Instead there’s a two-tier ecosystem: enormous state contractors doing the heavy lifting, and a fast-growing commercial layer being deliberately cultivated to chase reusability and cost. Here’s the cast.

CASC State Anchor
Long March rockets · the bulk of national launches
The backbone. Flew 73 of China’s 2025 launches and runs the Long March family, lofting 300+ spacecraft in a single year. It also owns the crewed and deep-space programs — the subject of Part 2 — but on launch volume alone, this is the engine.
» The institutional muscle that makes a 90+ launch year even possible
China SatNet State
Operator of the Guowang megaconstellation
The state entity tasked with deploying the ~13,000-satellite Guowang network. Sits under SASAC with guaranteed funding and priority launch access — treated as national infrastructure rather than a commercial venture.
» Its ITU deadlines are a major driver of China’s rising launch cadence
LandSpace Commercial
Zhuque rockets · reusability · Honghu-3 constellation
The frontrunner to be China’s answer to SpaceX. Flew the world’s first orbital methalox rocket (Zhuque-2) in 2023 and attempted China’s first booster landing with Zhuque-3 in 2025. Filed for a STAR Market IPO seeking up to ~$1B.
» Won launch contracts for both Guowang and Qianfan — demand is locked in
Space Pioneer Commercial
Tianlong-3 · kerolox Falcon 9-class rocket
Building Tianlong-3, a nine-engine medium-lift rocket closely modeled on Falcon 9, with an orbital debut expected in 2026. Aimed squarely at the high-volume constellation-deployment market.
» A second credible reusable contender keeps the cost race competitive
Shanghai Spacesail State-backed
Operator of the Qianfan (Thousand Sails) constellation
Shanghai-government-backed operator of the 15,000-satellite Qianfan network — widely viewed as China’s most commercially active LEO constellation, with real market-development and partnership activity.
» The constellation most likely to actually compete for international customers
CAS Space · CASIC Mixed
Kinetica / Lijian · Kuaizhou rockets
The supporting cast that fills out the manifest: CAS Space flies its Kinetica small-lifters, while CASIC runs the Kuaizhou series. Together with iSpace, Galactic Energy and Orienspace, they made up the 16 commercial launches in 2025.
» Breadth, not just depth — roughly two dozen vehicle families now fly

The Caveats You Should Keep in Mind

I’d be doing you a disservice if I left you thinking China has already won. It hasn’t, and there are real gaps. So let me be straight about three of them.

The budget is a genuine black box

Nobody outside Beijing really knows what China spends on space. The most-cited independent estimate (Euroconsult) put it around $12 billion for 2022 — below NASA’s budget — but analysts openly admit the true figure could be substantially higher and is essentially impossible to pin down. Treat any precise spending comparison with suspicion, including ones you’ll see quoted confidently elsewhere.

Reusability is still unproven

As of mid-2026, China has not yet recovered and reflown an orbital booster. SpaceX has done it hundreds of times. Until Zhuque-3 (or a rival) actually lands and re-flies, China’s per-launch economics remain far worse than SpaceX’s — which is exactly why those 28,000-satellite plans are so hard to fund through launch alone.

Cadence still trails badly

93 launches is a record — and still barely half of the 165 Falcon 9 flights SpaceX alone managed. Closing that gap requires not just more rockets but cheaper, reusable ones at factory scale. That’s the same wall every aspiring space power hits, and China hasn’t cleared it yet.

📌 The Bottom Line of Part 1

“Bigger than you think” isn’t hype — it’s a correction. In 2025 China flew a record 93 missions, started building two of the largest satellite constellations ever proposed, and came within meters of landing its first reusable booster. The mental model where it’s a distant runner-up is years out of date. The gaps are real — no proven reusability yet, an opaque budget, a cadence still well behind SpaceX — but every one of them is a problem China is now visibly, methodically closing. And here’s the catch: everything above is just the machine. What China plans to do with that machine — put humans on the Moon by 2030, and haul home pieces of asteroids and Mars — is arguably the more audacious half of the story. That’s Part 2.

Continue — Part 2 of 2
China’s 2030 Moon Plan — And the Quiet Streak of Deep-Space Firsts
The crewed lunar hardware that’s already being test-fired, the only far-side Moon samples ever returned, and a spacecraft now circling an asteroid 40 million km away. Publishing next.
China Space Program Guowang Qianfan Megaconstellation Zhuque-3 LandSpace Reusable Rocket CASC New Space
← Previous · 11
The Moon Base Race Is Back — And This Time It’s for Real
Who’s actually building a base on the Moon — and why the 2030s are the deadline

Comments

Figure, Tesla Optimus, 1X NEO — What's Actually Changed in 2026

Figure, Tesla Optimus, 1X NEO — What's Actually Changed in 2026 | Paradigm Shift Lab ◆ Robotics  ·  2026 Update Figure, Tesla Optimus, 1X NEO — What's Actually Changed in 2026 Not demos. Not concept renders. Real factories, real production lines, real dollar signs. Here's the honest 2026 scorecard for the humanoid robot race — and why this year is genuinely different. Figure AI Tesla Optimus 1X NEO Boston Dynamics Atlas PSL Editorial  ·  May 2026  ·  ~7 min read Let's be honest for a second. For the past three years, "humanoid robot updates" meant the same thing: a carefully choreographed demo, a funding announcement, and a CEO posting a slow-motion video of their robot picking up a box. Then everyone moved on. 2026 feels different. Not because the robots suddenly got perfect — they didn't. But ...

Glass Interposer vs Glass Core Substrate: TSMC CoPoS vs Intel EMIB Explained

Glass Substrate Series | Advanced Packaging Glass Interposer vs Glass Core Substrate: TSMC CoPoS vs Intel EMIB Explained They're both called "glass substrates" — but they solve completely different problems. The race to define AI chip packaging's future is playing out between two very different bets. ⬡ Paradigm Shift Lab · Advanced Packaging Deep Dive · 2026 ⚡ Key Takeaway Glass interposers replace the silicon bridge between GPU and HBM dies. Glass core substrates replace the entire organic base layer of a chip package. TSMC is betting on the former. Intel is pushing the latter. Same material — completely different strategy. Context Why Glass Now — The Limits of Organic Substrates The AI accelerator era has pushed semiconductor packaging requireme...

Boston Dynamics' Atlas Is Training for the 2026 World Cup — And I'm Not Sure How to Feel

Boston Dynamics' Atlas Is Training for the 2026 World Cup — And I'm Not Sure How to Feel (Part 1) ◆ Robotics  ·  Part 1 of 2 Boston Dynamics' Atlas Is Training for the 2026 World Cup — And I'm Not Sure How to Feel I genuinely believed robots doing fine, expressive, human-like movement was decades away. Then Boston Dynamics dropped a video this week. I had to revise everything. Boston Dynamics FIFA World Cup 2026 School of Football PSL Editorial  ·  May 2026  ·  ~5 min read Hyundai × FIFA World Cup 2026 Official Partner. That figure in the background isn't a player. It's Atlas. There are things you quietly file away as "not in my lifetime." Not impossible — just comfortably distant. Fusion energy. Mars colonies. And robots doing things that require genuine physical expressiveness. Haircuts. Dance. Spo...